I
nternet gathering place for custom rod builders
  • Custom Rod Builders - This message board is provided for your use by the sponsors listed on the left side of the page. Feel free to post any question, answers or topics related in any way to custom building. When purchasing products please remember those who sponsor this board.

  • Manufacturers and Vendors - Only board sponsors are permitted and encouraged to promote and advertise products on the board. You may become a sponsor for a nominal fee. It is the sponsor fees that pay for this message board.

  • Rules - Rod building is a decent and rewarding craft. Those who participate in it are assumed to be civilized individuals who are kind and considerate in their dealings with others. Please respond to others in the same fashion in which you would like to be responded to. Registration IS NOW required in order to post. You must include your actual First and Last name and a correct email address when registering or posting. Posts which are inflammatory, insulting, or that fail to include a proper name and email address will be removed and the persons responsible will be barred from further participation.

    Registration is now required in order to post. You must include your actual First and Last name and a correct email address when registering or posting.
SPONSORS

2024 ICRBE EXPO
CCS Database
Custom Rod Symbol
Common Cents Info
American Grips Piscari
American Tackle
Anglers Rsrc - Fuji
BackCreek Custom Rods
BatsonRainshadowALPS
CRB
Cork4Us
HNL Rod Blanks–CTS
Custom Fly Grips LLC
Decal Connection
Flex Coat Co.
Get Bit Outdoors
HFF Custom Rods
HYDRA
Janns Netcraft
Mudhole Custom Tackle
MHX Rod Blanks
North Fork Composites
Palmarius Rods
REC Components
RodBuilders Warehouse
RodHouse France
RodMaker Magazine
Schneiders Rod Shop
SeaGuide Corp.
Stryker Rods & Blanks
TackleZoom
The Rod Room
The FlySpoke Shop
USAmadefactory.com
Utmost Enterprises
VooDoo Rods

braid & guides
Posted by: Phil Ewanicki (---.res.bhn.net)
Date: December 28, 2013 03:24PM

The durability of guides is increasingly important, especially when using braid in environments with fine sand. Guide makers should reveal the Rockwell Hardness of guide inserts in their advertising. One number is much more useful than pages of anecdotes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: bill boettcher (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: December 28, 2013 04:23PM

Any info on that subject can not be trusted

The best thing is to ask builders that have used certain guides and braid lines and find out how the guides fared

Bill - willierods.com

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: Garry Thornton (---.natsow.res.rr.com)
Date: December 28, 2013 05:45PM

I think you are worried about nothing...
Today's guides are more likely to get cracked that to be worn by line.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: Tom Kirkman (Moderator)
Date: December 28, 2013 07:07PM

A Rockwell Hardness rating wouldn't be a bad thing - but I don't think anyone will do it.

.............

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: Spencer Phipps (---.war.clearwire-wmx.net)
Date: December 28, 2013 09:04PM

I see more Vickers hardness numbers than Rockwell on ceramics. American Tackle hasn't been bashful about supplying the info, a search of the archives should answer just about any questions on other guides.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: jim spooner (---.dyn.centurytel.net)
Date: December 28, 2013 10:19PM

This is from Cliff Hall.

VICKER'S HARDNESS SCALE:
RC= Ring Color
Stainless Steel (SS): 200
Chrome: 800-1000
Aluminum Oxide: 1200-1400 RC: Dk.Brown Fuji Harloy RC: GRAY,.
Alconite 1700 Fuji RC:Black ^ PacBay Hialoy RC: Dk.Brown ^
Zirconia: 1400-1800 American
Nanolite: 1800 American
SiC: 2200-2400 Fuji, PacBay. ALWAYS HARDEST RC: Dk.GRAY Shiney

Stainless Steel (SS): 400 [B.E.]
Chrome: 800-1000 [C.M.]
Carbaloy: 1000 [B.E.]
Aluminum Oxide: 1200-1400 [B.E., C.M.]
Alconite (Fuji): 1300-1500 [Fuji]
NanoLite (Titan): 1800 [J.M.]
Zirconia: 1000-1400 [M.G.]
Zirconia PVD: 1600 [B.E.]
SiC: 2200-2400 [B.E., C.M.]

VICKER'S HARDNESS SCALE:
Stainless Steel (SS): 200
Chrome: 800-1000
Aluminum Oxide: 1200-1400
Alconite: 1700
Zirconia: 1400-1800
NANOLITE: 1800
SiC: 2200-2400

VICKER'S HARDNESS SCALE Values for Line Guide Ring Materials 2005
Stainless Steel (SS): 400 [B.E.]
Chrome: 800-1000 [C.M.]
Carbaloy: 1000 [B.E.]
Aluminum Oxide: 1200-1400 [B.E., C.M.]
Alconite (Fuji): 1300-1500 [Fuji]
NanoLite (Titan): 1800 [J.M.]
Zirconia: 1000-1400 [M.G.]
Zirconia PVD: 1600 [B.E.]
SiC: 2200-2400 [B.E., C.M.]

ALL of these materials are SUFFICIENTLY HARD to make good guide rings.

ALL of the CERAMICS (Aluminum Oxide, Hardloy, Hialoy, Alconite, NanoLite, Zirconia, Silicon Nitride-SiN and Silicon Carbide-SiC) are HARDER than any metals (SS, Steel Files, Chrome) and HARDER than any SILICA (sand) or QUARTZ. Therefore, ANY of the CERAMICS make GREAT RING GUIDES.
However Silicon Carbide is indisputably the hardest among those listed above.

REFERENCES:
[B.E.] = BATSON ENTERPRISES ForeCast Components 2005 Catalog, page 2.
[C.M.] = Corrosion Management (May 2003), pp. 16-22.
[J.M.] = Joe Meehan, American Tackle – on RBO Forum –
[M.G.] = Mark Gibson, Material Sci./Eng. – on RBO Forum

-Cliff Hall+++, Gainesville, FL-USA*****(deceased)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: Burton Bosley (---.direcpc.com)
Date: December 29, 2013 09:56AM

Thanks Jim Spooner

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: Phil Ewanicki (---.res.bhn.net)
Date: December 29, 2013 10:07AM

Thanks, Jim Spooner. That's what I call an ANSWER.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: roger wilson (---.hsd1.mn.comcast.net)
Date: December 29, 2013 01:25PM

Phil,
I know that the numbers are important, but are there any users of the different guide types and materials today that actually have any evidence of line caused grooving of guides?

I wonder if folks are worrying about non issues.

Be safe

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: Phil Ewanicki (---.res.bhn.net)
Date: December 29, 2013 06:51PM

Roger: I have heard anecdotes concerning some supposedly ceramic guides grooving quickly in harsh conditions and usage. I have no first-hand experience of this phenomenon, but I usually fly fish. I enjoy stories more than numbers but rely more upon qualitative scientific measurement.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: Phil Ewanicki (---.res.bhn.net)
Date: December 29, 2013 06:51PM

Roger: I have heard anecdotes concerning some supposedly ceramic guides grooving quickly in harsh conditions and usage. I have no first-hand experience of this phenomenon, but I usually fly fish. I enjoy stories more than numbers but rely more upon qualitative scientific measurement.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: Mark Gwynne (101.162.40.---)
Date: December 30, 2013 08:46AM

I've always looked at it from the other way around. To me it's not the issue of the guides grooving but the abrasiveness of the guide ring wearing the line. In situations using heavy drag the braid can get damaged over time and lose some of its strength. It will result in having to change line more regularly if a guide ring was used that wasn't as hard/smooth as say SIC for example.
In some applications spending a little more on the guides will pay itself back with the line not having to be changed as often.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: Adam Curtis (---.static-ip.telepacific.net)
Date: December 30, 2013 01:09PM

I have had a hardloy tip groove from braided line. Primarily used in the salt. You can hear it.

This happened after 3-4 years of continuous braid usage. None of the guides on the rod were affected but I dont have the rod anymore to see if it was just a matter of time.

I put Alconites on anything that might see braid just because they are not that much more than Hardloys. But I dont think hardloys are going to fail on you anytime soon. That was 1 rod of a few at the time that had hardloys and saw 100% braided line over the course of 3-4+ years.

Now... putting SiCs on your swimbait rod...... I'm not ever going to be THAT cool...... And some of the cool guys dont even know if their frame material is SS or Alum. Oh boy....

CHA CHING!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: bill boettcher (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: December 30, 2013 01:54PM

Use the Alconites and a SIC tip top

Bill - willierods.com

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: Burton Bosley (---.direcpc.com)
Date: January 02, 2014 07:39AM

Where do the rec guides come in on the hardness scale? I guess I don't know what they're made of -

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: braid & guides
Posted by: jim spooner (---.dyn.centurytel.net)
Date: January 02, 2014 09:00AM

This was written by Thomas Lyle in 2006

[rodbuilding.org]


Recoil Guides What Are They Any Way

Hi There Again;
The Recoil guides are manufactured by Ultimate Ni Technologies; REC being there licensed distributor. Recoil guides are made with Nitinol a Nickel Titanium alloy developed by the Naval Ordnance Laboratory in the early sixty’s and is about 55% Nickel with the balance being Titanium and trace amounts of other metals to making up its alloys. Nitinol being not only a super stainless alloy but also has some unique properties in that it has shape memory and super elasticity. After being hot worked in to a shape it can be bent and stretched. Just to have it return back to its original shape and size earning it the name memory wire (just like those eye glass frames that you can wrap around your fingers and they will spring back into shape, it's the same metal alloy).

But it’s not the same kind of titanium alloys used in making the frames for guides with rings. Nor is it one of the harder stainless alloys developed by the Naval Ordnance Laboratory, SS316 stainless steel being harder. So if line wear and grooving of the guides are a real concern, you may wish to use another guide! But gram for gram Nitinol is lighter, stronger and more flexible that alloys like SS316. Making Recoil guides a better choice for fly rods and light spinning rods where its strength, flexibility and lighter weight are put to better use.

But there have been some troubles with them. In the past to much was made of the fact that they do recoil. I think that the wire was made to thin to show this off and there was a breakage problem with the very light guide sets, REC calls them Recoil fresh water fly guides. Also the feet trying to move around under the wrapping and coating with the snake guides has been a problem to. Both problems are due to there flexibility along with its shape memory of the wire which stores energy then releases it on recoil. Most metal guides give up most of the energy applied to it as heat.

The other problem is there cost at about $2.80 each compared to the under a buck price of most other wire guides. This has stopped rod makers from using them except on there most costly rods. If you have had to repair or replace a number of high end rods due to breakage or the feet dancing around under the wrappings you would stop using them. But some rod makers like Loom’s have had good luck with the thicker wired RSFX’s.

But things are not all bad with the Recoil guides if you understand them. They’re a very good guide for fly rods and light spinning rods. It’s my option that if you stay with what REC calls the Recoil saltwater fly guides, RSNX's and RSFX’s you should be fine and the same with the spinning guides. Just take a little extra time with dressing the feet and wrapping them. Or just use the single footed RSFX’s guides with a Forhan Locking Wrap and the same on the spinning guides to.

The sizes on the Recoil snake guides are with in the norm according to there spec. list and what I have seen. But things do get a little off centered with the single foot guides. I was told by an insider that when the manufacture first started making guides and was looking for buyers that some one placed small order for what should be a size #1SF guide and claimed proprietary rights to it and is still sitting on it. When REC started to sell the Recoil guides they ran from size #2 through #6. People started to ask for a size #1 guide and some one else had the rights to that size and wouldn’t give it up. So the Recoil #1SF is sized about half way in between size #1 and a size #1/0 to get around this. I didn’t know if the story is true or not but the #1SF Recoils are in between a #1 and #1/0 in size any way. The Recoil SF size #2 through #6 is a little bigger than normal.

Options: ReplyQuote


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Webmaster