SPONSORS
2024 ICRBE EXPO |
to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
Sean Hansen
(---.wtfrwi.tds.net)
Date: October 20, 2004 08:16PM
do you put your guides for a fly rod on the spine or opposite the spine on the rods i have built i believe i have put them on the spine not really sure but i have done the same on all my fly rods (when looking for the spine tip in hand and butt on table apply pressure and side that rolls to top is where i put my guides) i have different things and get confused thanks for any help Sean Hansen Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
Dan Sparks
(---.sb.sd.cox.net)
Date: October 20, 2004 08:50PM
Read the FAQ's. Topic #5 addresses your question. Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
John Dow
(---.snet.net)
Date: October 20, 2004 09:13PM
Personaly , on lighter fly rods , I lean more twards orienating the guides to the natural curve of the blank . Heavier rods , I place the guides on the inside of the spine. JD Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
Steve Lynas
(209.135.108.---)
Date: October 21, 2004 06:54AM
I believe the idea is to allow the blank to do what it wants to do naturally when it is fighting with a fish. For example when you roll your blank as you do and it jumps into position, it is jumping into the curve that it feels is the easy movement for it, that is the curve that is now facing upward at you. This curve is the path of least resistance for the blank and should be the side you put your guides on. So I believe you have been laying out your guides on the right side. This is my understanding of it, but hey I am new at this skill. Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
Frank Moore
(---.hfc.comcastbusine)
Date: October 21, 2004 10:02AM
Sean, I can not be sure by your post what you mean by the top - but if when you place the bend in the blank you are placing the guides on the inside (top??) of the bend, you are actually placing the guides opposite of the spine. The "effective" spine is the outside of the curve. See FAQ #2. Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
John Butterfield
(---.reserved.madisonriver.net)
Date: October 21, 2004 03:03PM
A couple of years ago I was surprised to find out that Sage and Loomis, do not spine their blanks. They determined where to put the guides by the straightness of the blank. In other words, if there is a slight curve to the blank and even the best blanks usually have a little curve, they put the guides on the bottom of the curve. I still spine my blanks, but this got me to thinking if it is really that important. ????? John Butterfield Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
Steve Kartalia
(---.ferc.gov)
Date: October 21, 2004 03:14PM
Lately (last couple dozen rods), I've been building to optimize straightness more than anything else. I notice no difference whatsoever and doubt if 1 person in 10,000 could. Just about anyone can notice a crooked rod though and that's why I started doing it this way. Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
Tom Kirkman
(---.152.54.57.Dial1.Atlanta1.Level3.net)
Date: October 21, 2004 03:56PM
Most rod customers sight down a new rod by holding the guides either straight up or straight down. This is why commercial rod operations put the guides on the straightest axis. It has nothing to do with performance, but rather everything to do with not having people refuse to buy a rod because they believe it's "crooked." ............... Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
Steve Kartalia
(---.ferc.gov)
Date: October 21, 2004 04:16PM
Well, the more I test my blanks with the CCS, the more I demonstrate to myself quantitatively why I can't feel anything regarding spine orientation in actual fishing and casting situations. I am not sensitive enough to notice a 1 penny difference. That being the case, if I can't feel the difference and the rod looks best when straightest, I see no downside to using the straightness method for guide orientation. Just my .02 (I might be able to feel this much money) Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
Tim Collins
(---.sanarb01.mi.comcast.net)
Date: October 21, 2004 08:58PM
I'm a novice rodbuilder and after learning about rod spines, I've stripped down and redone a couple rods and placed the guides directly on the spine and the difference is like night and day. Even my light weight rods cracks like a whip! This winter when football season is over, I'm going to strip down my 11'6" GLX and redo it with ceramics - besides I think I put too many snakes on it the first time. Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
John Barnes
(---.rconnect.com)
Date: October 21, 2004 10:27PM
I have built many rods and I always put my guides on so the soft side of the rod that bends the easiest goes towards the fish or the water. Why would you want the rod to bend with more resistance. good luck whatever you do Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
Kevin Malpass
(---.ipt.aol.com)
Date: October 21, 2004 10:34PM
Why would you want it to bend with less? Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
Doug Moore
(---.ipt.aol.com)
Date: October 22, 2004 12:31AM
Spine seems to be like opinions...everyone's got one! ------ Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
Raymond Mazza
(---.syr.east.verizon.net)
Date: October 22, 2004 11:45AM
Not true Doug, In two instances. #1) you can find a rod where it appears there is no effective spine and #2) I know many PEOPLE that are spineless!! Ray Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
Doug Moore
(---.ipt.aol.com)
Date: October 22, 2004 12:47PM
Point well taken Ray! Doug Re: to spine or not to spine
Posted by:
Sean Hansen
(---.wtfrwi.tds.net)
Date: October 22, 2004 04:46PM
well i supose i am going to keep doing it the way that i do as others have said the blank seems to bend the easiest that way and that is what i want the blank to do anyway this way there is no extra resistance to the fish tis is the best way i can put this like humans we bend foward the easiest and the spine is our back so i want the guides to be the front i think i worded that right if not please tell me Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|