I
nternet gathering place for custom rod builders
  • Custom Rod Builders - This message board is provided for your use by the sponsors listed on the left side of the page. Feel free to post any question, answers or topics related in any way to custom building. When purchasing products please remember those who sponsor this board.

  • Manufacturers and Vendors - Only board sponsors are permitted and encouraged to promote and advertise products on the board. You may become a sponsor for a nominal fee. It is the sponsor fees that pay for this message board.

  • Rules - Rod building is a decent and rewarding craft. Those who participate in it are assumed to be civilized individuals who are kind and considerate in their dealings with others. Please respond to others in the same fashion in which you would like to be responded to. Registration IS NOW required in order to post. You must include your actual First and Last name and a correct email address when registering or posting. Posts which are inflammatory, insulting, or that fail to include a proper name and email address will be removed and the persons responsible will be barred from further participation.

    Registration is now required in order to post. You must include your actual First and Last name and a correct email address when registering or posting.
SPONSORS

2024 ICRBE EXPO
CCS Database
Custom Rod Symbol
Common Cents Info
American Grips Piscari
American Tackle
Anglers Rsrc - Fuji
BackCreek Custom Rods
BatsonRainshadowALPS
CRB
Cork4Us
HNL Rod Blanks–CTS
Custom Fly Grips LLC
Decal Connection
Flex Coat Co.
Get Bit Outdoors
HFF Custom Rods
HYDRA
Janns Netcraft
Mudhole Custom Tackle
MHX Rod Blanks
North Fork Composites
Palmarius Rods
REC Components
RodBuilders Warehouse
RodHouse France
RodMaker Magazine
Schneiders Rod Shop
SeaGuide Corp.
Stryker Rods & Blanks
TackleZoom
The Rod Room
The FlySpoke Shop
USAmadefactory.com
Utmost Enterprises
VooDoo Rods

Lamiglas FL843 vs. GF843
Posted by: Mike Parker (208.27.204.---)
Date: January 14, 2004 01:25PM

I want to build a Lamiglas 7' 3wt fiberglass rod. What is the difference, other than color, between these two blanks? I only see the GF843 listed on the Mudhole site, is this a discontinued series, and/or maybe an old web page? Based on what I've heard about the FL843's action, I'm really interested in building this blank for small stream fishing, but I would like to hear about the GF843 before purchasing. Thanks.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Lamiglas FL843 vs. GF843
Posted by: Todd Vivian (209.63.109.---)
Date: January 14, 2004 01:43PM

There is a significant difference in the actions of these two blanks. The Fiberglass model being a slow action able to load and cast accurately at very short distances while the Grapite 843 requires considerable more line out to load it.
One other thing you might consider is the new Appalachian style small stream rods made with a high modulus material which provides better performance than the glass in tight yet will perform excellently at longer distances. There is a review done recently by Bob Petti of the Global Fly Fisher which I will paste below on these models. We also have a new composite blank in the 6'6" 3wt. 7' 3wt & 7'6" 4wt which offer the best of both worlds.

Thank you for your inquiry,

Todd R. Vivian
Lamigas, Inc.

Product Review:
Reviewed by Bob Petti
GFF Rating: 6
Excellent

Lamiglas Appalachian
7'6" 3pc 4wt blank

www.lamiglas.com



"Delightful. Crisp. Smooth."
I have had the pleasure of building and fishing many different types of fly rods, everything from the top-dollar brand names to very inexpensive imports. It has become apparent to me price is not always a good indicator of performance. In fact, it is hard to find a rod these days that anyone could honestly categorize as "a dog". In this world of no-fault warranties and acceptable performance across the price spectrum, I can't help but wonder what rod companies are doing to differentiate their products from their competitors outside the realm of advertising and hype.
In recent years, I have built and fished more 4wt rods than all others combined - especially 7'6" 4wts. That length and weight feels perfect for most of the trout streams I fish. Long enough to facilitate most common angling techniques, heavy enough to handle a variety of fly sizes and weights, yet short enough to feel comfortable in tight situations. I had heard a bit of buzz about the Lamiglas Appalachian series rods and blanks, so when Todd Vivian offered me a chance to review one, I jumped. I've reviewed other Lamiglas rods (see here and here), and I must admit my expectations were quite high.
The blank I received was the typical matte gray natural finish found on so many blanks these days. At first I didn't like those matte gray blanks, but I can honestly say it is now my preferred finish. For a custom builder, it opens the possibility of using all sorts of thread and wood combinations, where on a colored gloss blanks I feel someone constrained.
For the Appalachian, I used a nice birdseye maple wood spacer inside an aluminum uplocking reel seat. I've since learned that I chose the same model seat as Lamiglas for their factory rods, the difference being the wood choice. (Pacific Bay A5, in case you care). I finished the blank out with a simple cigar shaped grip, nickel silver winding check, and my preferred single foot chrome wire guides.
I had built the rod last winter, but I wanted to fish the rod several times, in different circumstances, before offering my review. After all, I can't really review a blank based on looks - especially the matte finished ones. They all look pretty much the same. And while you can run some Common Cents data on a blank, I firmly believe you cannot offer an honest opinion until you've taken it out fishing. The more often, the better.
The first time I took the Lamiglas out fishing, I did so with a specific purpose - to gather some thoughts for this review. Every time after that, I had a different purpose - to catch some fish! I liked the rod so much that every other small stream rod I own has gathered dust, including two brand new ones that I built at the same time as the Appalachian.
What differentiates this rod from the others? Two things stand out - it's weight and it's action.
The Appalachian is light as feather. I wish a had an good scale, because I am curious about the finished rod's weight. However, side-by-side casts with similar rods leaves no doubt. It is light in both actual weight and "swing weight" (i.e. it is "tip light", as opposed to "tip heavy"). It's not just a little bit lighter - it's is "Holy Cow!" lighter. Since my other rods were built with pretty much the same techniques - single foot wire guides, thread, and epoxy, the difference is most definitely the blank itself.
The action can best be described as progressively fast. On short casts, the tip will flex and load the rod perfectly. I can feel the rod load even when flicking short casts to close up targets. You know what I mean. On your knees, casting to a small spot fifteen or twenty feet away. Float the line behind you and then "flick" the line foward. Man, I love this rod for that kind of fishing. It's like it knows what I want to do and casts a perfect narrow loop with impressive speed. When I need to air out a bit more line, I can feel the rod flexing deeper into the butt and supporting much longer casts than I would expect from such a rod.
Being light, with such a smooth and crisp action, the finished rod is simply a joy to fish. You can feel what's happening beyond the rod, whether you're drifting a nymph or flicking a dry fly. I've lobbed split shot, swung streamers, and done just about everything else I can think of on a trout stream with this rod. Honestly - I can't say this strongly enough - it is a fantastic rod. As perfect a small stream 4wt rod that I could ever expect. Modestly priced, domestically produced, and having a good warranty, what more can a person expect?
The only problem is now I want to build the rest of the Appalachian models. I could use a little 3wt. Hmm ....

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Lamiglas FL843 vs. GF843
Posted by: Todd Vivian (209.63.109.---)
Date: January 14, 2004 01:46PM

Also Mike, we will have the full line of these blanks available in Charlotte and the built rods for testing. These will be available through all of our regular dealers and distributors.

Todd Vivian

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Lamiglas FL843 vs. GF843
Posted by: Mike Parker (208.27.204.---)
Date: January 14, 2004 02:31PM

I suppose what got me confused is that they (Mudhole) have the GF843 listed as a Fiberglass, Charcoal Black blank. I guess that is an incorrect listing, and it's really graphite?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Lamiglas FL843 vs. GF843
Posted by: Todd Vivian (209.63.109.---)
Date: January 14, 2004 03:19PM

Yes Mike it is a low modulus graphite blank we quite manufacturing ummmmm? 6 plus years ago......

Todd

Options: ReplyQuote


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Webmaster