SPONSORS
2024 ICRBE EXPO |
Lamiglas IMP 843 or 844 - compared to LP 842 or LSJ 842
Posted by:
Marc A. Morrone
(---.dsl.airstreamcomm.net)
Date: January 05, 2016 09:36AM
Anyone know how the Lami IMP 843 or 844 compare to the LP 842 or LSJ 842 as far as action? I know the LP or LSJ are probably lighter. Re: Lamiglas IMP 843 or 844 - compared to LP 842 or LSJ 842
Posted by:
Robert Tanner
(---.res.bhn.net)
Date: January 05, 2016 02:05PM
Talk to Todd at Mud Hole he will know......... Re: Lamiglas IMP 843 or 844 - compared to LP 842 or LSJ 842
Posted by:
Spencer Phipps
(---.tmodns.net)
Date: January 05, 2016 04:28PM
Night and day differences the LP/LSJ blanks are much faster actioned and lower powered. The LP being closer in power to the 843 than the 842 is in that line. Forgot to mention the LP842 was used in the highest powered XMG 50 dropshot production rod. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/05/2016 05:11PM by Spencer Phipps. Re: Lamiglas IMP 843 or 844 - compared to LP 842 or LSJ 842
Posted by:
Todd R. Vivian
(---.se.biz.rr.com)
Date: January 05, 2016 05:33PM
Actually it was the LP862 that was used in the Skeet Reese XMG DS rod. But pretty much what Spencer has stated rounds up the differences.
regards, Todd Regards, Todd Vivian Mud Hole Custom Tackle todd@mudhole.com Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|