I
nternet gathering place for custom rod builders
  • Custom Rod Builders - This message board is provided for your use by the sponsors listed on the left side of the page. Feel free to post any question, answers or topics related in any way to custom building. When purchasing products please remember those who sponsor this board.

  • Manufacturers and Vendors - Only board sponsors are permitted and encouraged to promote and advertise products on the board. You may become a sponsor for a nominal fee. It is the sponsor fees that pay for this message board.

  • Rules - Rod building is a decent and rewarding craft. Those who participate in it are assumed to be civilized individuals who are kind and considerate in their dealings with others. Please respond to others in the same fashion in which you would like to be responded to. Registration IS NOW required in order to post. You must include your actual First and Last name and a correct email address when registering or posting. Posts which are inflammatory, insulting, or that fail to include a proper name and email address will be removed and the persons responsible will be barred from further participation.

    Registration is now required in order to post. You must include your actual First and Last name and a correct email address when registering or posting.
SPONSORS

2024 ICRBE EXPO
CCS Database
Custom Rod Symbol
Common Cents Info
American Grips Piscari
American Tackle
Anglers Rsrc - Fuji
BackCreek Custom Rods
BatsonRainshadowALPS
CRB
Cork4Us
HNL Rod Blanks–CTS
Custom Fly Grips LLC
Decal Connection
Flex Coat Co.
Get Bit Outdoors
HFF Custom Rods
HYDRA
Janns Netcraft
Mudhole Custom Tackle
MHX Rod Blanks
North Fork Composites
Palmarius Rods
REC Components
RodBuilders Warehouse
RodHouse France
RodMaker Magazine
Schneiders Rod Shop
SeaGuide Corp.
Stryker Rods & Blanks
TackleZoom
The Rod Room
The FlySpoke Shop
USAmadefactory.com
Utmost Enterprises
VooDoo Rods

Comparison of thread finish penetration
Posted by: Herb Ladenheim (---.mia.bellsouth.net)
Date: March 17, 2010 11:15PM

I have always been suspicious of applying 2 light coats of thread finish vs one heavy one. My concern is that the first light coat will not penetrate all the way through to the blank and will not penetrate into the voids under the guide foot areas - and will seal the thread such that the second coat will also not penetrate.

I performed a little experiment using Diamond II. It seems that my concern was unfounded.
The pictures are on the Photo section under guide wraps. The pictures show that the light coating penetrates to the same degree that the heavy coat does and secures the guide foot as securely - even when the tunnels are not filled. Although, the filled tunnel does provide more support.
Herb

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Comparison of thread finish penetration
Posted by: Earl Hamilton (121.54.92.---)
Date: March 17, 2010 11:49PM

Thanks for letting us know Herb. I think you have brought up quite an inportant point here. It would be interesting to see if there is any difference between manufacturers?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Comparison of thread finish penetration
Posted by: J.B. Hunt (---.pool.dsl.logantele.com)
Date: March 18, 2010 12:05AM

Thanks Herb, that's good info. I've been wondering about that myself. I just replaced all the guides on a ST Croix Pitching rod and I unwound the thread out of curiosity to find most of the guides were very well stuck to the blank by way of finish penetration. The thread was penetrated completely through to the blank. Probably wouldn't work as well if one used CP. I have never unwound one of my own.

J.B.Hunt
Bowling Green, KY

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Comparison of thread finish penetration
Posted by: Greg Weaver (---.carolina.res.rr.com)
Date: March 18, 2010 08:15AM

Herb, In my opinion, the reason you get good penetration with a light coat of finish is because to get that light coat you are applying a little more pressure to the wraps with your brush. This causes the finish to penetrate and at the same time fill the tunnels better. If you lay a heavy coat of finish on with the intent of leaving it heavy, you are not going to press the brush as hard and thus not "press" the epoxy through the threads.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Comparison of thread finish penetration
Posted by: Tom Kirkman (Moderator)
Date: March 18, 2010 08:43AM

Penetration is dependent on two things - first, the thickness of the finish. Second, how long the finish takes to set. The longer it takes to set, the thinner it remains and the more penetration is achieved.

For most of what we do, however, any and all of the popular epoxies will go where they need to go. But you do need to move along and not spend minutes at a time on each guide wrap.

.............

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Comparison of thread finish penetration
Posted by: James Hicks (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: March 18, 2010 03:42PM

I just recently played around with checking out how well CP penetrated or if it stopped the epoxy from penetrating...
[www.rodbuilding.org]

I used lightly wrapped silk thread so I can see inside the wrap and used three heavy coats of CP. After the solvent evaporated there was very little solid matter remaining and the tunnels never got filled. The cured CP didn't stop the epoxy from getting in the tunnels but the lightly wrapped threads would have some effect on that.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Comparison of thread finish penetration
Posted by: Tom Kirkman (Moderator)
Date: March 18, 2010 03:56PM

If you apply enough CP and it penetrates the thread, which it should, then the epoxy can't penetrate because there is nowhere for it to go. That area has already been filled with CP, which is what you want.

But as you note, there is very little solid matter in CP which is why it's always a bad idea to thin it. Once you do that you're just putting water on your wraps which evaporates and leaves next to nothing behind.

The tunnel needs to be filled with something to ensure stability. Whether it's CP or epoxy makes no difference, but if the tunnels are filled the guide will be prone to "rocking" after a bit of use.

...............

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Comparison of thread finish penetration
Posted by: Herb Ladenheim (---.mia.bellsouth.net)
Date: March 18, 2010 05:33PM

Tom,
I hope you mean that if the tunnels are NOT filled they will rock.
Herb

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Comparison of thread finish penetration
Posted by: Mike Thompson (67.239.191.---)
Date: March 18, 2010 06:49PM

IMHO, I have found with testing the finishes on the market, Threadmaster has penetrated very well and helped with guide pull outs. Especially with micro guides. But I still do a Forhan locking wrap because I really dont want to chance pulling any out on customers rods. Now they just break them off when putting them into the rod lockers with the built in rod tubes. Although I dont think it is always necessary to do with this finish.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Comparison of thread finish penetration
Posted by: Tom Kirkman (Moderator)
Date: March 18, 2010 08:31PM

Sorry, yes, if the tunnels are not filled the guides will rock.

..........

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Comparison of thread finish penetration
Posted by: Ted Culin (---.ptldor.fios.verizon.net)
Date: March 19, 2010 08:44AM

I use a light coat of Threadmaster Lite as my first coat and have noted that the finish fills the voids and seals the ends of the feet without having to push the epoxy. It takes about 10 minutes for the epoxy to do this on its own and usually results in some bare threads when it cures, but that is all taken care of another coat of Lite or another coat of high build depending on the nature of the rod. I've had to repair a few braced wire frame boat guides and got the pleasure of taking apart some of my triple wraps to find fully filled tunnels through two layers of thread - I'm sold.

Thank you whoever you are

WWW.WeSeekHerRods.com

Options: ReplyQuote


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Webmaster