The combination of mass and velocity required to cause that to happen would be practically impossible in a real world fishing situation.

...........

Mark,
If something were to hit the "rod" hard and fast - like a hammer- certainly the rod would shatter.
However, it is very very difficult to damage a rod - with any thing hitting the line due to the flexing nature of the rod to allow the rod to flex and thus absorb the shock of the strike.

Take care
Roger

Doug;
Take the time to read these two threads. They should answer most of your questions.


[rodbuilding.org]

[rodbuilding.org]

Thanks to everyone that posted a reply.

The post was directed singlely at the 5-6-7-8 concept utilizing micro guides. When a person reads "no more than 4" spacing on the first guide" then encounters "Any tip size 5/64's or greater - 5"" the reader can't help but have questions. And as you might suspect I have read those very things. And as you might suspect it raised question. And as you know I ask'em. I tried to be very specific with my questions and the 5-6-7-8 concept in an attempt to avoid confusion.

Those much further along the learning curve may forget the time and expense associated with getting to where they are. I like the static load placement concept and have used that in 3 rebuilds to date. Two of my main stay methods of fishing are c'riggin' and crankbaits - Both of which place a premium on casting distance. If I can gain 3% distance on cast by spending time placing guides - I'll do it. Heck I'll do it for a 1% gain. My experience is the ones constantly on top of the heap are the ones that believe there is no item or issue involved that has little/no relevance and is willing to explore every avenue to gain an edge - no matter how seemingly insignificat it may appear when viewed in a stand alone mode. A lot of littles equals a lot!

You will read a lot of stuff on the internet and some of it is wrong and sometimes you have more than one answer that is right. But always look to see who the author is. Are they well known? Have their work stood the test of time? Is their work available for viewing to back up their words? Are they known for having given good advice on a regular basis? Is their name in plain view or do they use a hidden handle? You just have to learn how to select the good info from the bad.

John Sams Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You will read a lot of stuff on the internet and
> some of it is wrong and sometimes you have more
> than one answer that is right. But always look to
> see who the author is. Are they well known? Have
> their work stood the test of time? Is their work
> available for viewing to back up their words? Are
> they known for having given good advice on a
> regular basis? Is their name in plain view or do
> they use a hidden handle? You just have to learn
> how to select the good info from the bad.


John you are correct and determining "who's who" takes time. On the issue of no more than 4 or 5/64's and up 5" - both appear to be the correct answer depending on what's best for the application and intended use.