SPONSORS
2024 ICRBE EXPO |
Re: Rod and reel weight with respect to fishing satisfaction?
Posted by:
Tom Kirkman
(Moderator)
Date: November 25, 2009 12:45PM
I doubt you'd have enough volume to make any practical difference, not to mention that it would be tough to obtain the kind of seal that would allow the helium to stay in place and active over many seasons.
............. Re: Rod and reel weight with respect to fishing satisfaction?
Posted by:
matthew jacobs
(---.122.31.71.static.ip.windstream.net)
Date: November 25, 2009 01:56PM
Tom Kirkman Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > I doubt you'd have enough volume to make any > practical difference, not to mention that it would > be tough to obtain the kind of seal that would > allow the helium to stay in place and active over > many seasons. > > ............. And I've always wanted to hold the Hindenburg in my hand. Re: Rod and reel weight with respect to fishing satisfaction?
Posted by:
Phil Ewanicki
(---.safepages.com)
Date: November 25, 2009 07:53PM
Perhaps helium would be impractical. Then how about a small airfoil out near the tip-top, just big enough to supply more lift the faster the rod is swung? Wings would reduce the apparent weight of the rod and minimize the amount of additional weight which must be added to rods to achieve that light feeling. Re: Rod and reel weight with respect to fishing satisfaction?
Posted by:
Phil Ewanicki
(---.safepages.com)
Date: November 25, 2009 10:11PM
Back when, I spent too much time swinging a pickaxe and a shovel, often in the company of men who had scores of years of experience with these class three (as are fish rods) levers. I never saw a one attempt to make his task less taxing by adding extra weight to his pick or shovel to balance it. Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|