SPONSORS
2024 ICRBE EXPO |
Recoil vs. Fuji Sic casting distance?
Posted by:
Billy Russell
(---.proxy.aol.com)
Date: May 03, 2009 12:02AM
Ok I've read about 300 pages and I think I know about the weight/durability comparisons of these two guides. What I would like to hear is does the slicker surface of the Sic make for longer casts? I'm looking to make a long range panfish spinning rod out of a st croix SCV 6'6" blank . Weight is a issue for me but if the Recoils cost a couple of feet on the cast ,all things being equal,I'll go with the heavier Fuji Titanium Sic. Thanks and love the board. Billy Russell Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/03/2009 12:03AM by Billy Russell. Re: Recoil vs. Fuji Sic casting distance?
Posted by:
Herb Ladenheim
(---.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
Date: May 03, 2009 12:42AM
"Slicker" has nothing to do with casting distance. But - heavier guides (ceramics) will encumber the blank and probably cost you distance.
Herb Re: Recoil vs. Fuji Sic casting distance?
Posted by:
Chris Davis
(---.knology.net)
Date: May 03, 2009 01:29AM
Proper placement of the guides will probably have a bigger impact on distance than guide type, provided that you use the smallest size of either type appropriate for the end use and the minimum number needed. This is assuming the chosen blank has the proper casting weight range and appropriate line size is used.
Chris Re: Recoil vs. Fuji Sic casting distance?
Posted by:
jim spooner
(---.dyn.centurytel.net)
Date: May 03, 2009 07:54AM
Billy,
The Fuji LSG3.5 weighs .042 grams compared to the Recoil RSPG6’s .070 grams. Re: Recoil vs. Fuji Sic casting distance?
Posted by:
Tom Kirkman
(Moderator)
Date: May 03, 2009 08:21AM
You won't see any distance increase due to a slicker guide ring surface between the two. There isn't enough pressure between the line and the ring surface to cause any major friction.
If we're talking about guides that weigh roughly the same thing, and at least a reasonably smooth surface on one set of guides, having a much slicker or smoother surface on the other is not going to result in any measurable increase in casting distance. ................ Re: Recoil vs. Fuji Sic casting distance?
Posted by:
roger wilson
(---.hsd1.mn.comcast.net)
Date: May 03, 2009 11:58AM
Billy,
Guide size and spacing has much more to do with casting distance than any other variable - including type of guide construction. Roger Re: Recoil vs. Fuji Sic casting distance?
Posted by:
Jim Benenson
(---.albq.qwest.net)
Date: May 03, 2009 12:39PM
It may be a figment of my imagination (but maybe not), but it seems like the rods that I build using single foot ceramic guides (AmTac Titan) cast better than ones using snake guides. The line seems to flow more smoothly.
Jim Stonefly Custom Fly Rods 20 Vaquero Rd Santa Fe NM 87508 www.stoneflyrods.com Re: Recoil vs. Fuji Sic casting distance?
Posted by:
Mo Yang
(222.184.103.---)
Date: May 03, 2009 12:45PM
Jim,
I assume you are talking about fly rods? I wonder if the difference in fly versus mono line means that your observation may not apply to a spin rod... Roger, How does guide SIZE affect casting distance? If the weight is equal, are you saying that a larger or smaller ring will cast further? Thanks. Mo Re: Recoil vs. Fuji Sic casting distance?
Posted by:
Tom Kirkman
(Moderator)
Date: May 03, 2009 02:47PM
Jim,
If you did some actual tests, making hundreds of casts on the same blank for equal comparison, you are apt to find that there isn't any distance difference between similar sets up of ceramic versus snake guides. However, the ceramics will pay out line under pressure more smoothly, and the casts will be quieter. You'll also find your line lasts longer on the ceramic guided rod. But I've always been careful not to use casting distance as a selling point for ceramics. Any difference between guide sets of similar weight is miniscule. ................ Re: Recoil vs. Fuji Sic casting distance?
Posted by:
Mike Barkley
(---.try.wideopenwest.com)
Date: May 03, 2009 02:52PM
I would THINK that the smaller the guide, the more the line is kept under control and less oscillation/spiraling that the line will do, thus possibly increasing distance. Another reason to use as few different guide sizes as possible to choke the line down as quick as possible. The smaller the guide that will do the job will also reduce weight. Don't assume that ceramics are heavier than wire, that is not always the case. Mike (Southgate, MI) If I don't want to, I don't have to and nobody can make me (except my wife) cuz I'm RETIRED!! Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/03/2009 02:53PM by Mike Barkley. Re: Recoil vs. Fuji Sic casting distance?
Posted by:
Jim Benenson
(---.albq.qwest.net)
Date: May 03, 2009 04:29PM
Yes I was talking about fly rods, and I also said that it may be a figment of my imagination. I don't pay much attention to distance, as the farther away you are from a fish the less control you have over the line, lure, and fish. In almost all fresh water fly fishing if you can cast 30 ft you're all set. My first post said that the line seems to flow more smoothly, which is important to me.
Jim Stonefly Custom Fly Rods 20 Vaquero Rd Santa Fe NM 87508 www.stoneflyrods.com Re: Recoil vs. Fuji Sic casting distance?
Posted by:
Bobby Bolivia
(---.nwrknj.east.verizon.net)
Date: May 06, 2009 05:55AM
off topic but trying different line types will do more for distance that any guide will ever do. If I had guess I would say there might be a 50% increase from the worst to the best especially with very light lures. Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|