I
nternet gathering place for custom rod builders
  • Custom Rod Builders - This message board is provided for your use by the sponsors listed on the left side of the page. Feel free to post any question, answers or topics related in any way to custom building. When purchasing products please remember those who sponsor this board.

  • Manufacturers and Vendors - Only board sponsors are permitted and encouraged to promote and advertise products on the board. You may become a sponsor for a nominal fee. It is the sponsor fees that pay for this message board.

  • Rules - Rod building is a decent and rewarding craft. Those who participate in it are assumed to be civilized individuals who are kind and considerate in their dealings with others. Please respond to others in the same fashion in which you would like to be responded to. Registration IS NOW required in order to post. You must include your actual First and Last name and a correct email address when registering or posting. Posts which are inflammatory, insulting, or that fail to include a proper name and email address will be removed and the persons responsible will be barred from further participation.

    Registration is now required in order to post. You must include your actual First and Last name and a correct email address when registering or posting.
SPONSORS

2024 ICRBE EXPO
CCS Database
Custom Rod Symbol
Common Cents Info
American Grips Piscari
American Tackle
Anglers Rsrc - Fuji
BackCreek Custom Rods
BatsonRainshadowALPS
CRB
Cork4Us
HNL Rod Blanks–CTS
Custom Fly Grips LLC
Decal Connection
Flex Coat Co.
Get Bit Outdoors
HFF Custom Rods
HYDRA
Janns Netcraft
Mudhole Custom Tackle
MHX Rod Blanks
North Fork Composites
Palmarius Rods
REC Components
RodBuilders Warehouse
RodHouse France
RodMaker Magazine
Schneiders Rod Shop
SeaGuide Corp.
Stryker Rods & Blanks
TackleZoom
The Rod Room
The FlySpoke Shop
USAmadefactory.com
Utmost Enterprises
VooDoo Rods

Crude Tip-top comparison test - SiC vs wire
Posted by: Herb Ladenheim (---.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
Date: August 08, 2008 07:08PM

I have been steadfastly in favor of the REC recoil guides and tip-top to dress the blank with the lightest components I can find. But I know some builders believe that the SiC ceramics provide a more "slippery" surface - a lower coefficient of friction and less inertia to overcome.

So I loaded one plastic bag with 10 pennies and clipped it onto a section of fly line (down low) that was threaded through a REC recoil tip-top. I clipped (identical clip) another (indentical) bag and clipped it to the line on the other side of the tip-top (up high). It took 40 pennies to overcome initera and to lift the low 10 penny bag off the ground (by an inch).

I tried the same thing with the Fuji Ti SiC tip-top - 10 pennies on the lower bag and the same 40 pennies on the upper bag. The 40 penny top bag fell like a rock and the lower bag, of course, came up to the original position of the top bag.

Again, with the Fuji Ti SiC tip-top, I then took out 10 pennies from the top bag leaving 30; and added one penny at a time until the lower bag was an inch off the floor. It took another 5 pennies or a total of 35.

So, the REC tip-top took 40 pennies to raise the 10 pennies an inch and it took the SiC tip-top 35 pennies to raise the lower bag 1 inch.

I guess I will be at least trying the Fuji Ti SiC tip-top on my faster, heavier wt rods.

I know this experiment was very crude. But there is a difference between the force needed to overcome inertia. This is not a valid test of their respective coefficients of friction - but I would bet the SiC is lower.

The REC recoil may still allow the best virtues of a blank to come through vs the heavier SiC.

I am not drawing any conclusions here - maybe others performed a more scentific experiment???

Herb

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Crude Tip-top comparison test - SiC vs wire
Posted by: joseph arvay (---.sub-75-204-34.myvzw.com)
Date: August 09, 2008 01:07AM

Think the exact form of guide plays a role here? One thing I've noticed about the pics of recoils is that they have that "spring-like" form. The tip I'm looking at may have more friction via larger surface area that contacts the line. All the Recs I've seen in catalogs have that and I always wondered if aside from gathering crud, that double wire form is double friction.

Probably doesn't double the friction per se, but it would be more contact area. Never used them so I'm just throwing the idea out there.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Crude Tip-top comparison test - SiC vs wire
Posted by: jim spooner (---.dyn.centurytel.net)
Date: August 09, 2008 09:06AM

Just for the record, I just replaced the Recoil guides on one of my casting rods. The Recoils replaced were RSPG single foots, 10, 8, 6, 6, 6, 6 with a Fuji TFST 5.5 tip-top. I replaced them with Fuji TLSG’s (SF Ti/sic)10, 8, 5.5 and LSG’s (sic) 4, 3.5, 3.5 and also a 3.5 SF for the tip-top. The rod weight with Recoils was 3.02 ozs. With the Fuji’s it’s 3.01 ozs. Although the rod received heavy use this summer, I can't see any discernable wear in the Recoils.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Crude Tip-top comparison test - SiC vs wire
Posted by: Herb Ladenheim (---.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
Date: August 09, 2008 10:26AM

Joseph,
I only use the single wire tip-tops. Fly rods.
Herb

Options: ReplyQuote


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Webmaster