I
nternet gathering place for custom rod builders
  • Custom Rod Builders - This message board is provided for your use by the sponsors listed on the left side of the page. Feel free to post any question, answers or topics related in any way to custom building. When purchasing products please remember those who sponsor this board.

  • Manufacturers and Vendors - Only board sponsors are permitted and encouraged to promote and advertise products on the board. You may become a sponsor for a nominal fee. It is the sponsor fees that pay for this message board.

  • Rules - Rod building is a decent and rewarding craft. Those who participate in it are assumed to be civilized individuals who are kind and considerate in their dealings with others. Please respond to others in the same fashion in which you would like to be responded to. Registration IS NOW required in order to post. You must include your actual First and Last name and a correct email address when registering or posting. Posts which are inflammatory, insulting, or that fail to include a proper name and email address will be removed and the persons responsible will be barred from further participation.

    Registration is now required in order to post. You must include your actual First and Last name and a correct email address when registering or posting.
SPONSORS

2024 ICRBE EXPO
CCS Database
Custom Rod Symbol
Common Cents Info
American Grips Piscari
American Tackle
Anglers Rsrc - Fuji
BackCreek Custom Rods
BatsonRainshadowALPS
CRB
Cork4Us
HNL Rod Blanks–CTS
Custom Fly Grips LLC
Decal Connection
Flex Coat Co.
Get Bit Outdoors
HFF Custom Rods
HYDRA
Janns Netcraft
Mudhole Custom Tackle
MHX Rod Blanks
North Fork Composites
Palmarius Rods
REC Components
RodBuilders Warehouse
RodHouse France
RodMaker Magazine
Schneiders Rod Shop
SeaGuide Corp.
Stryker Rods & Blanks
TackleZoom
The Rod Room
The FlySpoke Shop
USAmadefactory.com
Utmost Enterprises
VooDoo Rods

Guide Sizing and Placement article - Volume 10 Issue 4.
Posted by: Tim Collins (---.hsd1.mi.comcast.net)
Date: September 06, 2007 09:32AM

I didn't really read this article much until this morning and now I'm a bit confused. Once the choker is set, the remaining distance to the tip is divided into equal segmants, no closer than 4" and no further than 5". Near the end of the article it says "Unlike the running guides which were placed equidistant from each other, the reduction guides will be placed progressively".

If I measure the running guides with my scale in figures 2 & 4 of the article, they appear to increase in distance from the tip towards the choker. So do I leave the running guides spaced equidistant as the article states or readjust them via the static test method as the pictures seem to indicate? Thanks.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Guide Sizing and Placement article - Volume 10 Issue 4.
Posted by: Anonymous User (Moderator)
Date: September 06, 2007 09:44AM

Do what the article says to do.

Photos often are taken from an angle that slightly skews the image so trying to measure the guides with a ruler or scale is not necessarily going to provide you with the correct figures. That's why the article text provided that information for you.

When a photo is necessary for purposes of exact scale or measurement, such as in our grip templates, the photo will indicate the scale it was shot at and will be be taken head on for accuracy needed in a template.

..............

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Guide Sizing and Placement article - Volume 10 Issue 4.
Posted by: Tim Collins (---.hsd1.mi.comcast.net)
Date: September 06, 2007 11:39AM

Thanks Tom, so regardless whether I have a moderate action or an extra fast action blank and whether it's 7' or 10' long, I should just place the running guides equidistant between the tip and choker guide and leave it at that? Thanks.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Guide Sizing and Placement article - Volume 10 Issue 4.
Posted by: Anonymous User (Moderator)
Date: September 06, 2007 01:51PM

Yes, that will work just fine.

If you want to space them progressively and have experience doing that, by all means feel free to do so. The column was written for beginners and using an equidistant spacing on the running guides simplifies things for them, makes a static distribution test uncessary and works just fine. But if you are beyond that stage don't be afraid to space them progressively and do a static distribution test.

.............

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Guide Sizing and Placement article - Volume 10 Issue 4.
Posted by: jon edwards (---.mia.bellsouth.net)
Date: September 06, 2007 03:06PM

Tom would doing a static distribution test be better or will it not matter very much?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Guide Sizing and Placement article - Volume 10 Issue 4.
Posted by: Anonymous User (Moderator)
Date: September 06, 2007 03:37PM

If you set up the rod the way the article tells you to, it really isn't necessary. You'll have enough guides and spaced such that you'll automatically have sufficient stress distribution for the rod blank.

...............

Options: ReplyQuote


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Webmaster