I
nternet gathering place for custom rod builders
  • Custom Rod Builders - This message board is provided for your use by the sponsors listed on the left side of the page. Feel free to post any question, answers or topics related in any way to custom building. When purchasing products please remember those who sponsor this board.

  • Manufacturers and Vendors - Only board sponsors are permitted and encouraged to promote and advertise products on the board. You may become a sponsor for a nominal fee. It is the sponsor fees that pay for this message board.

  • Rules - Rod building is a decent and rewarding craft. Those who participate in it are assumed to be civilized individuals who are kind and considerate in their dealings with others. Please respond to others in the same fashion in which you would like to be responded to. Registration IS NOW required in order to post. You must include your actual First and Last name and a correct email address when registering or posting. Posts which are inflammatory, insulting, or that fail to include a proper name and email address will be removed and the persons responsible will be barred from further participation.

    Registration is now required in order to post. You must include your actual First and Last name and a correct email address when registering or posting.
SPONSORS

ICRBE 2021
EXPO ON FACEBOOK
CCS Database
Int. Custom Rod Symbol
Common Cents Info
American Tackle
Anglers Rsrc - Fuji
Anglers Workshop
BatsonRainshadowALPS
BRC Rods
Cork Specialties LLC
CRB
HNL Rod Blanks–CTS
CTS New Zealand
Custom Fly Grips LLC
Decal Connection
Flex Coat Co.
Get Bit Outdoors
Hitena USA
HYDRA
Janns Netcraft
Mickels Custom Rods
Mudhole Custom Tackle
MHX Rod Blanks
North Fork Composites
Pacific Bay
ProProducts
REC Components
ReelSeatBlanks.com
Renzetti Inc.
Rod Builders Warehouse
RodHouse France
RodMaker Magazine
RodMaker Blog
Schneiders Rod Shop
SeaGuide Corp.
Tackleworks
The Rod Room
Trondak U-40
Utmost Enterprises
VisualWRAP/VisualWEAVE
ZipCast


Pages: 12345...LastNext
Current Page: 1 of 15
Results 1 - 30 of 435
6 weeks ago
jim spooner
Ron, tumbling would be a challenge since these are completed rods.
Forum: rodboard
6 weeks ago
jim spooner
Thanks, guys. Btw, the reel seats are plastic (polymer).
Forum: rodboard
6 weeks ago
jim spooner
Thanks Spenser. I don't anything about glass beading, but I'll look into it.
Forum: rodboard
6 weeks ago
jim spooner
I do quite a bit of sculpting (skeletonizing) on my casting reel seats and thinking about sand-blasting them to get a better finish than I get by sanding/buffing. Any suggestions on what gun I need and type of grit?
Forum: rodboard
7 months ago
jim spooner
I had several NFC HM blanks that were significantly higher in power than some I previously purchased of the same model numbers. We’re all aware that blank power specs are likely to fluctuate somewhat within a given model, but these were dramatically different. Because the blanks in question were also much heavier, I suspected that they were not sufficiently sanded by NFC. Being unhappy with them,
Forum: rodboard
8 months ago
jim spooner
I’ve also been notified of my order placed last Nov is being shipped….long wait. I like their blanks and my only complaint is their significant inconsistencies (weight, Power, Action) for a given model.
Forum: rodboard
8 months ago
jim spooner
Did that this AM, same conclusions…..although the longer rod did offer more resistance at 90 degrees to lure retrieve . If I had two rods that varied more than 18 to 24” in length, it’d be easier to say objectively that one was much more sensitive than the other. I can only suggest to anyone that they try test casting with different rod orientations as I have stated. It’s pretty easy to make
Forum: rodboard
8 months ago
jim spooner
I considered using the 2nd or 3rd guide from the rod (same rod) as the tip-top to replicate a “short rod”, but my “test” results enabled me to draw my own conclusions without any further testing or theories or mathematical calculations. I’m pretty well convinced that the rod inhibits rather than enhances sensitivity, so the lightest (least mass), stiffest rod is the lesser of the evils. Btw, I ha
Forum: rodboard
8 months ago
jim spooner
In spite of my reluctance to believe leverage plays much of a role in “my” version of “sensitivity”, and in an effort to keep an open mind, I conducted the test Tom suggested…..or at least similar. I figured that rather than using two different rod lengths, I could replicate length differences by simply changing the angle of the rod….the rod at 90 degrees to the retrieve obviously representing th
Forum: rodboard
8 months ago
jim spooner
Yes, leverage with longer rod gives a fish an indisputable mechanical advantage, and it is apparent when fighting a fish. But, I don’t think “leverage” is much of an issue regarding sensitivity with bite detection or lure activity. I think in terms of a “bite” (or lure movement) transmitting a “signal” up the line to the angler’s hand. Any rod (regardless of length) and the reel only acts to degr
Forum: rodboard
8 months ago
jim spooner
Tom, I agree, some do have different interpretations of sensitivity. I guess where I disagree is where you stated “ I’ve long known that longer rods allow you feel a fish strike better, precisely because you’re handing the fish a longer lever to use against you”. In regards to line or rod movement …..if a “bite” occurs resulting in a line movement of 1 ½” and assuming the tip of a 7 ½’ rod
Forum: rodboard
8 months ago
jim spooner
I guess we can agree to disagree. Maybe my interpretation of “sensitivity” is not quite the same as Tom’s. I subscribe to Mike Naylor’s and Emory Harry’s positions on the subject in this thread this thread from 2007
Forum: rodboard
1 year ago
jim spooner
Well said, Steve.
Forum: rodboard
2 years ago
jim spooner
Adam, I'd look for a Fuji Speed Stick handle (and/or rod). Some are glue-ins and others use a collet system. There are still some floating around. Try Google search. Just about any blank can be adapted. Btw, one advantage of these old grips over modern blank-thru grips is that they allowed the reel to sit much lower on the rod, making for a shallow angle of the line from the reel to first guide.
Forum: rodboard
2 years ago
jim spooner
Yes, trimming from butt end does lessen power, but ironically, the rod will feel stiffer.
Forum: rodboard
2 years ago
jim spooner
Phil, Extending the rod length will actually increase the power.
Forum: rodboard
2 years ago
jim spooner
It is a question of patience. As Roger suggests, 100 grit would be good start. I went from 60 to 150, to 220, then used green, then gray Scotch-Brite pads to polish.
Forum: rodboard
2 years ago
jim spooner
Mo, I recently received several NFC HM blanks that were significantly higher in power than some I currently had of the same model numbers. We’re all aware that blank power specs are likely to fluctuate somewhat within a given model, but these were dramatically different. Because the blanks in question were also much heavier, I suspected that they were not sufficiently sanded by NFC. Being unhap
Forum: rodboard
2 years ago
jim spooner
Since “short” rods are no longer popular, very few blanks are available shorter than 6 1/2 feet. All my personal builds are under 6’, so I have no option but to trim. Other than having to pay for unusable “footage”, there’s not much downside. In fact an advantage is having the option of “tuning” the Power/Action by trimming from the tip or butt end of a longer blank to achieve the desired perform
Forum: rodboard
2 years ago
jim spooner
Joshua, Your friend’s use of the 6’ rod may not be as dramatic and/or extreme as it seems. I can relate to being old (dinosaur) and favoring shorter rods. Most of my bass rods are 6 foot or less and although they provide increased leverage over longer rods, the shorter grips don’t usually allow as much force to be applied. Some of my fishing is much the same as described and I can even get by wi
Forum: rodboard
3 years ago
jim spooner
I consider myself suitably chastised.
Forum: rodboard
3 years ago
jim spooner
Disappointed maybe, or disgusted, but not not angry. When petty animosity precludes open discussion, no one benefits. I think there’s credible pros and cons for both CCS and the so-called RDA, but perhaps they’d best be debated on more of a one-on-one venue. I did question your rationale for the cheap shot “knock off” label, but your explanation as to what you see as plagiarization of the “Big Pi
Forum: rodboard
3 years ago
jim spooner
Okay, now I get it. So I guess there’s a sense of moral/ethical consternation because of the use (theft) of some methods prescribed in the CCS article. Evidently there’s a contentious history of debate regarding the subject, so I’ll refrain from giving further reasons why I think RDA can be useful. Obviously it’s not a subject open to discussion and no sense risking being banished from the web-si
Forum: rodboard
3 years ago
jim spooner
I agree with all of the above….most of it anyway. And I don’t dispute Tom’s proclamation as to which system came first…..for those of us that care. His reference to RDA being a “Knock-off” may be a bit irrational. Although I think CCS is the most effective way to make relative blank comparisons, I think it’s unlikely that all blank manufacturers will provide it any time soon, and even if they
Forum: rodboard
3 years ago
jim spooner
This subject came up in another thread (http://rodbuilding.org/read.php?2,467692), so I thought it may be worthy of a new thread. It seems that whenever the RDA (Rod Data Analysis) measuring system is brought up, the proponents of CCS begin to hyper-ventilate, and unless there’s a viable copyright infringement, I don’t get it. I can’t imagine referring a rod builder to the “Big Picture” articl
Forum: rodboard
3 years ago
jim spooner
I agree. If all manufacturers provided the CCS ratings it’d be helpful…..along with length, butt diameter, tip size and weight, line/lure ratings, and any other info that would help categorize blank characteristics. Unfortunately, many blank/rod manufacturers show little interest in measuring and/or posting CCS ratings. Even for those that do provide the CCS data, the rod builder has to understan
Forum: rodboard
3 years ago
jim spooner
I think the system of measuring should be determined by what your intent is for the ratings. For blank comparisons and for two-handed casting rods, the CCS is probably more appropriate. With rods being cast using two hands, the entire length of the rod is part of the dynamics of casting (and fish-fighting), so using CCS, where overall length is relevant, would be preferable. If you want a means t
Forum: rodboard
3 years ago
jim spooner

Forum: rodboard
3 years ago
jim spooner
I failed to note that the above stated conversion is based on the RDA (or “Big Picture”) system of measuring AA (reel seat to rod tip), as opposed to the method defined in CCS (overall length). There is a marked difference in AA measurements between the two methods. I.E. A rod measured using the RDA will be 5 to 6 degrees less than if measured using the overall length of CCS. FWIW, this is wha
Forum: rodboard
3 years ago
jim spooner
In addition to max dead-lift, I also think that because it’s the stiffest axis, it’d provide max sensitivity as well…..at least for certain retrieves. Whether the difference is discernable would be debatable.
Forum: rodboard
Pages: 12345...LastNext
Current Page: 1 of 15

Webmaster