Re: NFC MB or SJ
Posted by:
Shawn Riebe
(---.midco.net)
Date: November 11, 2020 08:06PM
David Baylor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Shawn, your outline of what the CCS numbers mean
> is correct. IP = intrinsic power. The numbers
> Norman and I gave are the number of grams it takes
> to deflect the blank 1/3 of it's total length.
> Let's say you have 7' rod held horizontal and
> level. 1/3 of 7' is 28" so you add weight hanging
> from the tip, until the tip is 28" below where the
> tip was when the entire rod was horizontal.
>
> You are also right about the HM versus IM. I would
> say the IM blanks are more durable. And like you,
> I take care of my rods in that I don't drop them
> or treat them roughly, but when it comes to
> landing and horsing fish, I some times put them in
> some at times, dicey predicaments. In other words,
> I boat flip fish. Of course there is a right way
> and a wrong way to boat flip a fish, but some
> times a fish does something you don't expect and
> your rod gets put in jeopardy. I've boat flipped 4
> lb largemouth with the rod built on the MB 709 and
> never once felt I was in danger of breaking it. I
> wouldn't even consider doing that with the rods I
> have built on the MB 736 (or SJ 736 whichever it
> is)
>
> Anyhow, I've yet to build on a straight HM blank
> from NFC, but as mentioned I don't find the
> sensitivity of the IM blank all that far behind
> the X ray blanks I've built on.
David, thanks for validating my new education on CCS! Also, thanks for the info on gabbing more power in a 9 instead of the 5 or 6 for pitching. I hope to make these rods something that I really enjoy and a new hobby is born!!
